Hi Michael,
Thanks for your fast response! My humble apology - I should have mentioned
the firmware version we started with!
We started with the 0.81 sources (which is the latest version as far as I
know).
Thx
Gerard
-----Original Message-----
From: Krau, Michael P [mailto:***@intel.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 5:25 PM
To: ***@tekmagic.net; edk2-***@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [edk2] Supporting 2nd HDMI port for Intel Atom Bay-Trail
(E3800)?
What version of the MinnowBoard MAX sources did you start from? According
to the release notes, there were changes made on the 0.80 version release to
support Dual-HDMI display outputs.
If the firmware is based upon an earlier set of sources, then it will
probably not have those changes, which seems to be appropriate to your
goals. If you are using the 0.80 or later sources, then it will require a
more technical and specific of discussion.
Michael Krau
While I am an Intel employee, I do not represent Intel and am not authorized
to speak for Intel.
-----Original Message-----
From: Gerard Bucas [mailto:***@tekmagic.net]
Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 1:50 PM
To: edk2-***@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [edk2] Supporting 2nd HDMI port for Intel Atom Bay-Trail (E3800)?
We have a new Intel Atom E3800 (Bay Trail) based board with 2 x HDMI ports.
We are using the edk2 firmware (used the minnowBoard MAX firmware source as
basis) but we can't seem to get the HDMI-2 port to be recognized by either
the firmware or our linux kernel (built with yocto project - kernel version
is 3.19.5).
Can anyone give me some pointers as to what we need in either/both firmware
and linux kernel to get the 2nd HDMI port to be enumerated/recognized?
Thanks!
Gerard Bucas
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
edk2-***@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/edk2-devel
------------------------------------------------------------------------------